Our research library is 43 articles about compounds we sell. That is a conflict of interest, and no statement of principles makes it go away — so this page sets out what we do to keep the two apart, in terms specific enough that you can check them.
Who writes these articles
They are written and maintained in-house and published without a personal byline. That is a deliberate choice rather than an oversight. Attaching a name to a page implies that the name is the reason to believe it, and on a summary of published literature it is not — the sources are. Every factual claim here should be traceable to something you can read yourself, and where it is not, that is a defect worth reporting.
We would rather say that plainly than assign a credential that does not survive scrutiny. Nobody on this team is a clinician, and nothing here is written or reviewed by one.
Where the numbers come from
- Purity figures come from the certificate for the lot in stock and nowhere else. They are never rounded up, never averaged across lots, and never carried over from a previous batch. All 30 certificates are published in full, from 2 independent laboratories, including the lots that come in under our 99% release target.
- Molecular formulas, masses and CAS numbers are reconciled against PubChem and the FDA/NCATS Global Substance Registration System before publication. Where a compound has no registered CAS number — which is true of several newer research peptides — we say so rather than printing a plausible-looking one.
- Mechanism and study descriptions summarise peer-reviewed preclinical and clinical literature. Where the evidence is animal-only, early-phase, or contested, the article says which.
- Prices and stock on every page are read live from the catalogue, so they cannot drift out of date. The price list is generated the same way.
What we will not publish
These are research materials. They are not medicines, and we are not permitted — or qualified — to write about them as though they were. So no article here will ever contain:
- A human dose, a dosing schedule, or a protocol.
- A claim that a compound treats, prevents or cures any condition.
- Advice on administration, cycling, stacking or combining compounds in a person.
- Before-and-after imagery, testimonials, or transformation claims.
- A comparison to an approved drug that implies our material is a substitute for it.
If you find something on this site that crosses one of those lines, it is a mistake and we want to know. Nothing we sell is for human or veterinary use.
How claims are checked and corrected
Identifiers are re-verified whenever an article is substantively revised. Purity figures update automatically when a new lot is released, because they are read from the certificate rather than typed into the article. Every article carries its own certificate link so the number on the page can be checked against the document it came from.
Corrections are made in place. If you believe something here is wrong — a mechanism described loosely, a study characterised unfairly, an identifier that does not match the public record — write to [email protected] with the page and the source, and we will either fix it or explain why we read the evidence differently.
What we sell, and why that matters here
We sell the compounds we write about. An article that concludes a compound is poorly evidenced is an article that costs us sales, and several of them do exactly that — which is the only real test of whether a page like this means anything. The testing process is documented separately, and the certificates are published whether or not they flatter us.
Common questions
Who writes the articles on this site?
They are written and maintained in-house and published without a personal byline. On summaries of published literature the sources are the reason to believe a claim, not the author, so every factual statement should be traceable to something you can read yourself. Nobody on the team is a clinician and nothing here is written or reviewed by one.
Where do the purity numbers come from?
From the Certificate of Analysis for the lot currently in stock, and nowhere else. They are never rounded up or averaged across lots. All 30 certificates are published in full as free downloads, from 2 independent laboratories, including lots that measure below our 99% release target.
How do you verify molecular formulas and CAS numbers?
Every identifier is reconciled against PubChem and the FDA/NCATS Global Substance Registration System before publication. Where a compound has no registered CAS number, which is the case for several newer research peptides, we state that rather than publishing an unverified one.
Do your articles include dosing information?
No. These are research materials, not medicines. No article here contains a human dose, a dosing schedule, a protocol, or advice on administration, and none claims that a compound treats, prevents or cures any condition.
How do I report an error?
Email [email protected] with the page and the source you are relying on. Corrections are made in place, and we will either fix the page or explain why we read the evidence differently.
Research use only
All products are supplied strictly for laboratory research use. They are not drugs, foods, cosmetics or medical devices, and are not for human or veterinary use.
